Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> fwiw, we're going to need the tool name in any pragma anyways so the
> existing thing that should be common is:
>
> # tool-name: meaningfultoken
>
> It seems like the only convention that makes sense to me.
One of the things that bother me about end-line comments is that this is
going to blow up line length limits. I think this could work if such
pragma comments could apply to the following line, and multiline pragmas
would be acceptable. Then you could have something like:
# flake8: disable=unused-import
# mypy: alias=pathlib2.Path
# coverage: ignore=when>py2.7
> When I saw your flake8 example of "# noqa: F401" I wanted to rip my eyes
> out. Because it didn't mention the tool name *and* it used a numeric code.
> Tool authors: use descriptive names! Otherwise it is meaningless to anyone
> reading it. ex:
Hah. One of the things I never imagined was that folks would throw
around numeric PEP numbers and just expect everyone to have PEP 0
tattooed to the back of their eyelids. Quick, let's discuss PEP 3128!
Cheers,
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
