Instead of `imath`, how about `math.integer` for the module name? On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Steven D'Aprano] >> > about 4.7 seconds to test 2**800 + 1; >> >> [Jeroen Demeyer] >> >>> In SageMath: >>> >>> sage: n = 2**800+1; timeit('is_prime(n)') >>> 625 loops, best of 3: 303 µs per loop >>> >>> That's 4 orders of magnitude faster... >> >> > [Tim] > >> More like 6, yes? >> > > Heh - sorry about that. A speck of dirt on my monitor made me read '303" > as "3.03". > > >> My Python version is more like 3, but is way fast enough for most >> things I do: >> > > So my Python Miller-Rabin code (already shared) was about one order of > magnitude slower. > ... > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/