Le 16/08/2018 à 20:34, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Brice Parent wrote:
If I understand well the need (I'm unsure I've had it myself), it would
be easier to be able to import the function in the active context, like
this:
def foo(a):
return a + c
def bar(a, c):
return foo(a)
def bazz(a, c):
import __file__.foo
return foo(a)
[...]
I'm not saying the syntax is the one that should be used (__file__
possibly not existing may be a problem), not even saying that we should
have this. I'm just showing a way to do the same thing with an easier
(to me) syntax.
The problem isn't that __file__ doesn't exist, it is that import DOES
exist and does something completely unsuitable:
[...]
That's what I was trying to say: I'm not proposing a syntax or any
specific solution.
It was more about graphically explaining that I found more explicit
(that word again...) to import (or copy, or insert) the target function
inside the active scope than to have it done when you call the function
itself.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
