Hello everyone, I'm quite new working with asyncio and thus maybe missing some things about it, but wouldn't it be quite easier to have some iterables to support async for loops "natively", since asyncio is now part of the Stdlib?
I've tried to work with asyncio while using discord.py, and has some struggle with an "async for" loop on a dictionary, so I had to implement a new dict subclass that would just reimplement items(), keys() and values() functions. I think that it would be a cool improvement to implement some of those in some standard way. There's some code I wrote on a CodeReview thread but I still haven't got any feedback on it. Here's the link of the thread : https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/197551/asynchronous-dictionary-in-python Regards,
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
