On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Simon De Greve <degreve...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm quite new working with asyncio and thus maybe missing some things about > it, but wouldn't it be quite easier to have some iterables to support async > for loops "natively", since asyncio is now part of the Stdlib? > > I've tried to work with asyncio while using discord.py, and has some > struggle with an "async for" loop on a dictionary, so I had to implement a > new dict subclass that would just reimplement items(), keys() and values() > functions. > > I think that it would be a cool improvement to implement some of those in > some standard way. There's some code I wrote on a CodeReview thread but I > still haven't got any feedback on it. > > Here's the link of the thread : > https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/197551/asynchronous-dictionary-in-python
You can do this, but I don't see what it accomplishes... Are you aware that you can use regular 'for' loops inside 'async def' functions? -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
