On Sep 4, 2019, at 08:08, Joao S. O. Bueno <[email protected]> wrote: > > I second that such a feature would be useful, as I am on the verge of > implementing > a work-around for that in a project right now.
This seems common enough that, whatever the final design is, someone should put a concurrent39 or whatever backport package on PyPI. (I assume both you and Chris need this feature now (and can’t afford to wait 1.5 years or longer until you can get away with requiring Python 3.9+), and I suspect there are multiple others in the same boat, so it seems like there’s a good chance someone will do it.) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DXNNMKKVA377WCXZDWS7PUZVVPL2Q3V7/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
