I would use it, and I prefer | for the reasons given by Stephen, MRAB, and the other proponents.
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:08:32 AM UTC-4, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2019, at 21:10, Stephen J. Turnbull < > turnbull...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > I'm not against having an operator for updating dicts, but "+" is not > > it. "|" is fine, though. > > It seems like people who don’t really like this feature and don’t plan to > use it mostly really want it to be spelled | if it has to be added. But > people who are dying for it mostly want + (except for the ones who want all > the set operators). I’m not sure what that means… > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python...@python.org <javascript:> > To unsubscribe send an email to python-id...@python.org <javascript:> > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TV73IEFOV77Z64RN2QXOKYIOBCUHD45I/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/NXQ4YKXCT6SHZ6QDRWCAE4RJB5MULPSQ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
