On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:02 PM Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, another change I'd make is to break the tradition of coding every > itertools function in C. That makes the implementation bar much > higher, and the other similar packages (more_itertools, > toolz.itertools) don't bother. There's also that pypy has trouble > optimizing code using itertools heavily, _because_ it's written in C > instead of Python. > This deserves a separate thread. If we're going to gradually add more recipes to itertools, that sounds like a good idea. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/XTP6TCNYBMB4EBOKVXN4LKL6WE7YU2V6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
