I have no behavior for integers in mind. I would expect high-level libraries to want to implement behavior for it.
- sympy - pandas, numpy, sklearn, statsmodels - other mathematically minded libraries (monadic bind or compose?) To do this we need a name. I like `__sim__`. Then we'll need `__rsim__` and `__isim__` for completeness. We need to make room for it in the grammar. Is it ok to give it the same priority of evaluation as `+` or `-`, or slightly higher? In the past we've made additions to the language when we've been parsing and evaluating strings. That's what we're currently doing in statsmodels right now because we lack the binary (in the sense of two-arguments) `~`. See: https://www.statsmodels.org/dev/example_formulas.html _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/JWC4HJVTHQA532VIW62UXVPMOEVVR2IT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
