Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 16:23, Alex Hall alex.moj...@gmail.com wrote: > you have to establish that your > behaviour is significantly better than the status quo, and I don't > think that you're doing that at the moment. And IMO, you're never > likely to do so simply by quoting numbers of people who do or don't > prefer the current behaviour - compelling arguments are typically > around demonstrating how much code would be demonstrably better with > the new behaviour, along with showing that code that is detrimentally > affected has an easy workaround. Your .chars() proposal targets the > latter question, but neither you, nor anyone else in past iterations > of this discussion, have yet come up with anything persuasive for the > former, that I'm aware of. > Paul
Yeah, I tiresomely agree (can I say that in English?) Once again... we need evidence: real workable surprising code! Please... _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GK6IS2NHENLN2UZQUCH7PLPVBPVF64WZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
