> > I beg to differ. I do find "def foo(a, *, b)" gets in the way of > readability. > > -- > Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd >
In what way? In any case, focusing on the calling syntax being proposed, is there anything unreadable about: foo(a, *, b) compared to foo(a, b=b) ? I think in the proposed syntax it's quite easy to understand that we're passing arguments 'a' and 'b' even if we have no idea what the '*' means, and it's small enough that it's fairly easy to mentally filter out.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/NWJTHDZMZHXVEMEXKKA4TSFYU47IU5BB/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
