On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:12:26PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > For what matters, when I stopped to think about this, I came out with this > exactly design! > > Maybe this is a 'one obvious way' to deal with it, without changing any > syntax?
There's nothing "obvious" about using a private implementation detail of CPython that probably won't work in other Pythons. > > ... caller = sys._getframe(1) Outsider: "Python needs proper private variables." The Python community: "We don't need that, everyone knows not to use names starting with a single leading underscore because they're private." Also the Python community: "Let's use `_getframe`!" *wink* -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VVZJDHPNLIC2ZTGQAUHUDXGPRXSIKUD3/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
