> On 28 Apr 2020, at 16:12, Rhodri James <rho...@kynesim.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2020 15:46, Brandt Bucher wrote:
>> Thanks for weighing in, everybody.
>> Over the course of the last week, it has become surprisingly clear that this
>> change is controversial enough to require a PEP.
>> With that in mind, I've started drafting one summarizing the discussion that
>> took place here, and arguing for the addition of a boolean flag to the `zip`
>> constructor. Antoine Pitrou has agreed to sponsor, and I've chatted with
>> another core developer who shares my view that such a flag wouldn't violate
>> Python's existing design philosophies.
>> I'll be watching this thread, and should have a draft posted to the list for
>> feedback this week.
>
> -1 on the flag. I'd be happy to have a separate zip_strict() (however you
> spell it), but behaviour switches just smell wrong.
Also -1 on the flag.
1. A new name can be searched for.
2. You do not force a if on the flag for every single call to zip.
Barry
>
> --
> Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BZUJUTAVOHJEUZ6QEIRZWZHKCRXE6AAS/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/XEQIZHKWNKFDWQCBK4FAEGP2TEMDTMMP/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
