On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 8:47 PM Edwin Zimmerman <ed...@211mainstreet.net> wrote:
> Wouldn't this break backwards compatibility with everything the whole way > back to 3.0? I fear a future with where I have to run a 2to3 type tool on > third-party dependencies just to get them to work with my 3.7 code base. > My interpretation was that this would be syntactic sugar, not a deprecation and replacement. In other words, the existing syntax would still be valid forever. >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5LMSZESV4YGJ2MDB3HSV5TIFFHSABL6J/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
