On 16/06/2020 10:23, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be desired to modularize Python library and then to
provide part of standard library through PyPi It will add possibility
to evolve separately run-time and standard library

Uh, aren't the runtime and standard library already separate creatures?

I think standard library should be as small as needed and all other
functionality should be provided through PyPi It will be similar as
`Rust` did ... they have pretty small `standard library` and `core
library`

This is absolutely contrary to Python's "batteries included" philosophy, so you are going to have to work to justify it.

If Python would have small `standard library` and `core library` it
would be add standardization for basic functional that should have
some Python implementation ...

I would have expected (and your examples show) *less* standardization, not more.

--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ADNUZDDIILZ4QX4FDCTEETJHXCWCVLOV/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to