Edwin Zimmerman wrote: > This is still true. There are some of us that will scream very very loud if > the std > lib disappears from Python installers. However, I think there could easily > be a way to > satisfy both parties here. How difficult would it be to release both full > and minimal > installers for every release? That way everyone could have it their way. > --Edwin > On 6/16/2020 6:51 AM, Stéfane Fermigier wrote: > > It has also been discussed that some people can't > > rely on anything outside the standard packages, due to the constraints of > > their company or > > their field. > >
This attempt will at least make some standardization of libraries for different Python implementations: CPython, PyPy, Brython, RustPython, MicroPython, Pycopy For example if user writes application in RustPython for WASM which will be executed in browser it could use only libcore api for base logic packages and some specific platform api within implementation of Python This attempt was done previously by .NET with .NET Standard that allows to write libraries that could be run on any implementation of .NET (.NET Framework or Mono) Since in Python we have a lot of different implementations it would be nice to know that if I use the libcore functionality it will run everywhere and if I use libstd it will run only where requirements of the system allow to use full package or where author of implementation implemented those packages _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/4EKU3MZRWOG5JKCLEATUKTMUGD2TLMTC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
