Please read PEP 505 before rehashing this old idea. On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:35 Daniel. <danielhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I need to traverse nested dicts, is a common pattern to do > > somedict.get('foo', {}).get('bar', {}) > > But there is no such equivalent for arrays, wouldn't be nice if we can > follow > > somedict.get('foo', {}).get('bar', []).get(10) ... ? > > What I do in this case is surround with try/except IndexError and set some > variable to None, or wrap the try/except block in a function. But this is > noise in my opinion, I just want to follow the same reasoning that I have > with dicts: I'm searching for some path deep nested, and want a default if > not found. > > What do you think? > > Regards > > -- > “If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't even start. ..." > Charles Bukowski > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LLK3EQ3QWNDB54SEBKJ4XEV4LXP5HVJS/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/L64EPHNKVRFLSBJE53GPQ4JFNVNOPH7U/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/