Oh, sorry, I will take a look.
Thanks!
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 12:06, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>
escreveu:
> Please read PEP 505 before rehashing this old idea.
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:35 Daniel. <danielhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When I need to traverse nested dicts, is a common pattern to do
>>
>> somedict.get('foo', {}).get('bar', {})
>>
>> But there is no such equivalent for arrays, wouldn't be nice if we can
>> follow
>>
>> somedict.get('foo', {}).get('bar', []).get(10) ... ?
>>
>> What I do in this case is surround with try/except IndexError and set
>> some variable to None, or wrap the try/except block in a function. But this
>> is noise in my opinion, I just want to follow the same reasoning that I
>> have with dicts: I'm searching for some path deep nested, and want a
>> default if not found.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> “If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't even start.
>> ..."
>> Charles Bukowski
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
>> Message archived at
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LLK3EQ3QWNDB54SEBKJ4XEV4LXP5HVJS/
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
> --
> --Guido (mobile)
>
--
“If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't even start. ..."
Charles Bukowski
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/PU7G6CUAIPCZYLFZTJTM6P5UWCIULWOJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
