On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:46:03AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> 1) The math module is written in C, and Guido at least (he was still BDFL
> then) rejected the idea of refactoring it to allow Python components (yes,
> that was proposed, and even started by, I think, Victor Stiner). Yes, you
> can write generic functions in C, but it's a lot more of a pain.
I think that it is long past time that we give up the idea that the math
module is a thin wrapper around the system's C maths library. We should
just add a math.py file that looks like this:
from _math import *
> 2) The rest of the math module is currently all about floats already,
That's not really the case, and hasn't been for a while. Some functions
manage to work very well with non-floats:
py> math.factorial(100)
9332621544394415268169923885626670049071596826438162146859296389
5217599993229915608941463976156518286253697920827223758251185210
916864000000000000000000000000
# New in Python 3.8 I think?
py> math.prod([1, 2, 3, Fraction(1, 5)])
Fraction(6, 5)
Even if they return a float, or int, they still work with non-floats
without losing accuracy:
py> math.log10(10**5000)
5000.0
py> math.ceil(Fraction(1, 10**5000))
1
even when the argument would overflow or underflow.
--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LK4P7AKLUPTJX5RWF6E2Q5HC25HTGNAO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
