Is there ANY chance of setting the default reply-to to the list? I know everyone else thinks that's a bid idea, but I doubt this was actually intended just for me.
If it was, I apologize for bringing it back on the list. On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:12 PM Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:51 PM Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> > wrote: > As I and Eric already said several times, we can do it in C already -- > itertools.islice. > > ... itertools.islice is implemented in C too. No need to call next() from > Python stack. > Ahh -- thanks! I had no idea islice() was in C -- yes, then, there probably is little to gain from a C implementation. I'd still be interested in the performance comparison, but not enough to try to write a direct-access-to-the-internals-of-dict C version myself :-) I still like the idea of indexing the order-preserving dict, but we do seem to not have any compelling use cases. Particularly if someone does get a reservoir sampling implementation in the stdlib. (see another thread for that) -CHB -- Christopher Barker, PhD Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZL2VYGVO7MB63TAJKDL4YKSB64X5YP55/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
