Hello, On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:09:42 -0700 Caleb Donovick <donov...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> I have wanted this and suggested it before for use with typing. > > Defining protocols is obnoxiously verbose for "struct" like data and > keyword > arguments to subscript could help alleviate that. > I often want to write type hint like this: > > ``` > def foo(x: Protocol[id=int, name=str]): > bar(x) > baz(x) Just write them as: --- from __future__ import annotations def foo(x: Protocol(id=int, name=str)): --- So, if using in annotations is the usecase, no new language syntax is required, just update your "Protocol" definition to https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0563/ [] -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/O2CCKMRHWUMGGC2YEHKXXL4ZN3DFYFHJ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
