Todd wrote:
Only Jonathan seems to want to do it differently. We are trying to find
> out exactly why he prefers this approach. So far the only advantage I have
> seen is that it is easier to experiment with.
>
I think it's good to make experiments before making a decision. That's
where I'd like us to do next. Let's learn from shared experience.
By the way, using
>>> d[o(1, 2, a=3, b=4)]
for a suitable 'o' and item function decorator has I believe all the
capabilities of any scheme proposed (for a suitable 'o' and decorator).
I'd rather make my case by doing experiments using various values of 'o'
(and the associated function decorator).
--
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/6IOMDGLPCUB5VEDSGZAXPM6W47JX5ULQ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
