On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:16 PM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:

> > If xarray supports keyword arguments, this would assign to the
> > corresponding values.  If it didn't, it would create a new element of the
> > Dataset containing "y[a=2, b=3]".  But "y" would continue working as it
> > would, only with different values than expected.
>
> Thanks Todd, that's an excellent example of how an unexpected change
> could lead to code doing the wrong thing instead of a nice, easy to
> diagnose exception.
>

well, that isn't currently supported syntax anyway, so xarray won't break.

But if we did add support for this, then xarray might use it, then it's a
question of what it means -- I can't see how it would be ambiguous or break
anything. though maybe I"m missing something ....

And what I'm missing might be this: Jonatha's proposal is designed to make
it easy for:

[x=4, y=5]

to make a little immutable mapping that can be used as a dict key.
essentially shorthand for what you now have to do with:

[CustomImmutableMapping(x=4, y=5)]

But the problem with that is that if a class wants to use keyword indexing
in a different way, then it would require extra effort to do so.

-CHB

-- 
Christopher Barker, PhD

Python Language Consulting
  - Teaching
  - Scientific Software Development
  - Desktop GUI and Web Development
  - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/D6XB7FZ4LBEZ6UM2KXX4WOMWBLNRDBWW/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to