On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:46 AM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> If there is anything that might justify the name "tuple (or list) > literal" it would be a tuple with each item a literal: > > (1, "a", None) > > but certainly not one containing expressions or names: > > (spam+1, eggs(), aardvark.cheese) > That sounds sensible, I hadn't thought about the terminology that carefully. But in case anyone disagrees, the exact terms are not really the point. The point is that this: (a, b) = c is 'assigning to a literal' just as much as this: f"{a} {b}" = c Both are just things that look like expressions with dynamic values but aren't.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BJVIRUU4NQ2E57ELZ4N4YMB5CCUQW5YT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/