On 26/09/20 7:26 am, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
The suggestion ... was not that it would be a type-checking error to call the inverse function without catching the exception. It only becomes a type-checking error if a function calls the inverse function and claims not to raise the exception.
This isn't very coherent. We've agreed that the declared exceptions is not an exhaustive list of the exceptions that may be raised. So not declaring an exception is *not* claiming not to raise it! -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6GJ5ZW3K52SYUT3RDDMYAW6WQUSQ5SAM/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
