On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:15 PM Martin Teichmann <martin.teichm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, Hi List, > > having slept over it, I think I have to take back my offer to write a PEP. > Why? Well, I am actually sure that it will get rejected anyways.
Wouldn't be the first time a PEP has been written with full expectation of it being rejected, though! > I see that you would like to sum up the discussion in a PEP so you can point > future requesters there. But given that there are repeatedly requests here, > and over at sympy I learned they even wrote a pre-parser, not to forget > André's efforts presented here, shows that there seems to be an actual need. > Telling people: "look at that PEP, we solved that ages ago" would be > dishonest, because we did not. > A PEP doesn't mean that we've solved anything; it means that there is a single place where the arguments for and against have been gathered, rather than searching through email archives. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OVFB5W734JPZXT4FYO2N6FXE327KF6Q2/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
