Thanks for the reference, Lucas. I wasn't familiar with toolz and it looks similar to a package I'm contributing to with a similar purpose of filling holes in the standard library, as such shouldn't some of this stuff be targeted for integration?
I'm a bit dubious about the pypi suggestion as packages are being regularly poisoned with malware ( e.g. New KEKW malware infects open-source Python Wheel files via a PyPI distribution | SC Media (scmagazine.com) <https://www.scmagazine.com/news/devops/kekw-malware-infects-open-source-python-wheel-files> ) and support issues keep happening with package management tools. As a result, I have been hesitant to onboard new packages without at least a code review (not that would help me against future deltas) and would prefer to import as few modules outside the standard library as a result. Also, I was under the impression that Python was "batteries included" so why wouldn't it include:lazy, currying, monads...directly in the standard library? On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 6:39 PM Lucas Wiman <lucas.wi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems fine, but a pypi library seems better than the standard library. > Separately, I think this is usually called "currying", and there are > already libraries which implement this functionality, eg toolz: > https://toolz.readthedocs.io/en/latest/curry.html > > Best wishes, > Lucas Wiman >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/M33XBBE6MVHFPMOKSHEZ7ZXOP4VDHDSK/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
