On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 05:14, Daniel Guffey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Apologies, I didn't mean to imply PyPI was inherently untrustworthy, 
> unusable, or irrelevant. Clearly, it has a place and I use it for packages 
> that I am familiar with and trust.

Then I would advise being careful how you word things, since what you
said was a pretty clear recommendation against ever using it.

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XI2JLNJZ7VPFMHNEAPXX2GCXXVC6YLWM/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to