On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 16:25 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 15:56, Stephen J. Turnbull <
> turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>>
>>  > The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
>>  > distributed; the trust signals that human users infer from it
>>  > should always be distributed.
>>
>> ISTM the primary use cases advanced here have been for "naive" users.
>> Likely they won't be in a position to decide whether they trust Guido
>> van Rossum or Egg Rando more.  So in practice they'll often want to go
>> with some kind of publicly weighted average of scores.
>>
>
> I'll also point out that I'm a long-standing Python developer, and a core
> dev, and I still *regularly* get surprised by finding out that community
> members that I know and respect are maintainers of projects that I had no
> idea they were associated with. Which suggests that I have no idea how many
> *other* people who I think of as "just another person" might be maintainers
> of key, high-profile projects. So I think that a model based round
> weighting results based on "who you trust" would have some rather
> unfortunate failure modes.
>
> Honestly, I'd be more likely to go with "I can assume that projects that
> are dependencies of other projects that I already know are good quality,
> are themselves good quality". Which excludes people from the
> equation altogether, but which falls apart when I'm looking for a library
> in a new area.
>
> Paul
>

Cautious +1, since PageRank did pretty well for a good stint in a somewhat
analogous environment.

>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/J5RH7ZGWO23APG42E6ZU5QPRXMYKJ7W4/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to