I'll go for "unsubscribe" On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Amit Aronovitch <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Omer Zak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am subscribed to both Python-IL and PyWeb-IL and my desktop PC does >> not seem to display to me duplicate E-mail messages. >> However I couldn't ignore the following classican spammers' line: >> >> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:52 +0200, Shai Berger wrote: >> > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ilan wrote: >> > > There's hardly any traffic in Python-IL, and although I don't >> > > want to miss it, having to archive two copies of everything >> > > from PyWeb-IL is annoying me. >> > >> > Then don't. On any sane mail client (and it looks like you're using >> one), >> > setting up a rule that discards python-il messages coming from PyWeb-IL >> will >> > take you less than it took you to write this message. >> >> This is the classical line which any spammer would feed you - "use the >> Delete key, dammit!" >> >> One place where it would hurt nevertheless: >> People who have Internet bandwidth on budget. >> For example: me, when reading my E-mail via the cellular network. I >> have Internet connectivity plan for 30MB/month, and it gets used up when >> I donwload E-mail to read when I am on the road (and far from WiFi hot >> spots). >> >> > But I do not understand why do you insist on having PyWeb-IL send you > emails as well if you are subscribed to Python-IL anyways. Just go to "Edit > my membership" in the google-group and choose no-email (which should have > been the default IMO). > If you use regular email client (rather than google reader/google groups) > and want PyWeb messages to go to a different folder than python-il (I do > not, btw), messages are clearly tagged (subject:, to:, contents) so should > be no problem to setup the rule. > > So please be considerate to people who read E-mail via the cellular >> network and are not willing to pay for bigger data plan. >> > > We should try to be considerate to everyone... > I know from previous correspondence that there are people here who have > much stronger objections for having to manage one extra > mail-list-subscription (prefer smaller number of lists carrying the same > total contents) than to having to select one non-default subscription option > (no-email) in google groups (or maybe they give up on permission to post to > Pyweb). > There are Pyweb-IL readers who do not want to read the Python-IL content, > but upto now I did *not* know of any Python-IL reader who does not want to > read Pyweb-IL ("extra traffic" in this sense is different than the issue of > duplicate messages), so it made sense to have Python-IL include Pyweb, but > not the other way around. > > All that said - I'm trying to serve the public, so ***votes please*** > (well, more like opinions, since anyone is welcome to discuss or change > their decisions). > > Until either side manages to convince the other to change their mind, I'll > sum up: > > Ilan, Omer, Arik : unsubscribe > Shai, Amit : keep current state > > AA > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-il mailing list > [email protected] > http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il > > -- Sincerely, Ram Rachum
_______________________________________________ Python-il mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
