On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I can not break the original code in 2.4, if I try this:
[...]
>
> So although the dictionary solution is much nicer nothing seems wrong
> with your code as it is - or am I missing something?
Nope, the current code works. I'm just looking at Python's cool ways of
solving problems. (the matter about 11 returns was a coding-style report from
PyChecker).
Cheers,
Frans
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
