Alex Martelli wrote:
Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   ...

If I could see how to go from 'object' (or 'int', 'str', 'file', etc.)
to 'eval' or '__import__', that would help out a lot...


object.__subclasses__()

[<type 'type'>, <type 'weakref'>, <type 'int'>, <type 'basestring'>, <type 'list'>, <type 'NoneType'>, <type 'NotImplementedType'>, <type 'module'>, <type 'zipimport.zipimporter'>, <type 'posix.stat_result'>, <type 'posix.statvfs_result'>, <type 'dict'>, <type 'function'>, <class 'site._Printer'>, <class 'site._Helper'>, <type 'set'>, <type 'file'>]

Traipse through these, find one class that has an unbound method, get
that unbound method's func_globals, bingo.

So long as any Python modules are imported using the same restricted environment their func_globals won't contain eval() or __import__ either.


And C methods don't have func_globals at all.

However, we're talking about building a custom interpreter here, so there's no reason not to simply find the dangerous functions at the C-level and replace their bodies with "PyErr_SetString(PyExc_Exception, "Access to this operation not allowed in restricted build"); return NULL;".

Then it doesn't matter *how* you get hold of file(), it still won't work. (I can hear the capabilities folks screaming already. . .)

Combine that with a pre-populated read-only sys.modules and a restricted custom interpreter would be quite doable. Execute it in a separate process and things should be fairly solid.

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to