Joel Hedlund wrote: <OT> > Bruno >> Your email address seem to be wrong.
let's say "disguised" !-) > I tried to reply to you > directly in order to avoid thread bloat but my mail bounced. I don't think it's a good idea anyway - this thread is on topic here and may be of interest to others too IMHO. And while we're at it : please avoid top-posting. <OT> > Thanks for the quick reply though. I've skimmed through some docs on > your suggestions and I'll be sure to read up on them properly later. But > as I said to Robert Kern in this thread, this does not really seem > resolve the > problem of setting an approprate level of validation. The "appropriate" level of validation depends on the context. There's just no one-size-fits-all solution here. The only guideline I could come with is too be paranoïd about what comes from the outside world and mostly confident about what comes from other parts of the application. -- bruno desthuilliers python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])" -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list