Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > you're not the designer... > > I don't have to be. Whoever the designer was, they had not properly thought > through the uses of this function. That's quite obvious already, to anybody > who works with HTML a lot. So the function is broken and needs to be fixed. > > If you're worried about changing the semantics of a function that keeps the > same "cgi.escape" name, then fine. We delete the existing function and add > a new, properly-designed one. _That_ will be a wake-up call to all the > users of the existing function to fix their code.
Wow. Are you always that arrogant for things you know very little about, or just plain stupid ? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
