Duncan Booth wrote: > No it isn't Pythonic.
rubbish. using a single constructor that handles two common use cases is perfectly Pythonic (especially if you're targeting casual programmers). </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Duncan Booth wrote: > No it isn't Pythonic.
rubbish. using a single constructor that handles two common use cases is perfectly Pythonic (especially if you're targeting casual programmers). </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list