"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan Booth wrote: > >> No it isn't Pythonic. > > rubbish. using a single constructor that handles two common use cases is > perfectly Pythonic (especially if you're targeting casual programmers). > Yes, but I don't think that the specific case the OP asked about would be pythonic: there was no need two separate calling conventions there. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list