"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Giovanni Bajo schrieb: > > It is an extremely bad picture for an open source flag like Python > > to go to a vendor for such an easy requirement as a bug database. > > You fail to recognize that Python is *already* using a non-free software > for bug tracking, as do thousands of other projects. So from that point > of view, the status wouldn't change.
The whole point of moving *from* SF *to* another bug tracker is to improve the situation, surely. You already seem to acknowledge that using free-software tools to develop Python is desirable. I don't see why you're being so obtuse in this sub-thread on *why* it's desirable. -- \ "The Stones, I love the Stones; I can't believe they're still | `\ doing it after all these years. I watch them whenever I can: | _o__) Fred, Barney, ..." -- Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
