Giovanni Bajo wrote: > I am seriously concerned > that the PSF infrastructure committee EVER considered non open-source > applications for this. In fact, I thought that was an implicit requirement in > the selection.
The goal of the selection process is to support the work of the Python developers who have to actually *use* the bug tracking system, and support its upkeep. In accordance with the Zen of Python, Practicality beats purity. P.S. The Sourceforge tracker being used now and for the past several years isn't open source, either, so it's hardly an emergency to have an open source tracker *now*. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list