Neil Cerutti wrote: > On 2006-10-19, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>James Stroud wrote: >> >> >>>without requiring an iterator >> >>can we perhaps invent some more arbitrary constraints while >>we're at it? > > > No letter G. I don't like them. They wet their nests. >
The requirement for an iterator is the constraint. Removin the requirement for the iterator removes the constraint. Or is the iterator the convenience? James -- James Stroud UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics Box 951570 Los Angeles, CA 90095 http://www.jamesstroud.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
