André Thieme wrote: > mystilleef schrieb: > >> Ken Tilton wrote: >> >>> Lisp has all the cool qualities you like in your pets, plus native >>> compilation in most implementations, plus maturity and a standard, plus >>> a better OO, plus macros, plus a dozen more small wins. Including >>> automatic indentation. :) >>> >> >> Better OO? You mean the one that doesn't support basic encapsulation >> and is retardedly cumbersome to use? There's a reason I said, I'd never >> use Lisp for OO not even when I'm high. Gimme Python, Eiffel or >> Smalltalk anyday, not the retarded add-on package bolted on CL. > > > What do you mean with "encapsulation" in this context?
Mr. mystilleef's remarks struck me as needlessly contentious and perhaps unavoidably ignorant, hence unworthy of response. YMMV. ken -- Algebra: http://www.tilton-technology.com/LispNycAlgebra1.htm "Well, I've wrestled with reality for thirty-five years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd "I'll say I'm losing my grip, and it feels terrific." -- Smiling husband to scowling wife, New Yorker cartoon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
