[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I should assume you meant Common Lisp, but there isn't really any > reason you couldn't > > (poke destination (peek source))
That breaks the reliability of GC. I'd say you're no longer writing in Lisp if you use something like that. Writing in this "augmented Lisp" can be ok if well-localized and done carefully, but you no longer have the guarantees that you get from unaugmented Lisp. By adding one feature you've removed another. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
