Alexander Schmolck a écrit : > Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>And why is that superior to this: >> >>def avg(l): >> return float(sum(l))/len(l) >> >> >>>>>avg([1,2,3,4]) >> >>2.5 > > > Apart from being less to type and it is superior in that it's generalizes much > better, e.g: > > avg&.^. NB. geomtric mean > avg&.% NB. harmonic mean > avg M NB. column mean of matrix M > avg"1 M NB. row mean of matrix M > 'as
Would my beloved wife's life depend on it, I just couldn't say what all this garbage is supposed to mean. If that's supposed to be "superior", I'm quite happy with my inferior favorite languages... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
