On Feb 14, 11:55 am, Schüle Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > lst = list((1,2,3)) > lst = [1,2,3] > > t = tupel((1,2,3)) > t = (1,2,3) > > s = set((1,2,3)) > s = ... > > it would be nice feature to have builtin literal for set type > maybe in P3 .. what about? > s = <1,2,3> > > Regards, Daniel
sets aren't quite that useful or common. just use a list. and '<' and '>' already have syntactic meanings. and that would make python look more like C++, which nobody wants. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
