On Feb 23, 2:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Feb 23, 10:34 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 23, 10:39 am, Martin Manns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:52:06 -0600 > > > > Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I quick search of Google turned up: > > > > >http://books.google.com/books?id=1Shx_VXS6ioC&pg=PA625&lpg=PA625&dq=p... > > > >http://calcrpnpy.sourceforge.net/clnum.html > > > >http://gmpy.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Sorry that I did not point these out initially. > > > > + clnum seems to be slower and for speed may be compiled to wrap gmp so > > > that it is just an additional layer between python and gmp . > > > > + gmpy is looking pretty unmaintained (dead) to me (newest update of > > > cvs 10 months ago). > > I worked with Alex Martelli (gmpy's maintainer) to fix a bug found by > mensanator. With Alex's permission, I released it as gmpy 1.04a. Alex > has not updated cvs with the fix. > > gmpy 1.04a compiles cleanly with the latest releases of Python and > GMP, so I consider it stable.
Am I hallucinating? Didn't I see at least some version of gmpy for Python 2.5 on SourceForge awhile back? I distinctly remember thinking that I don't have to direct people to your site, but SourceForge is not showing anything beyond vesion 1.01 for Python 2.4. > > > Actually, gmpy is being maitained even if SourceForge isn't up to > > date. > > > I got my gmpy 1.04a for Python 2.5 Windows binary from > > > <http://home.comcast.net/~casevh> > > > I haven't used the rationals all that much, but been very > > happy with them when I have. > > casevh -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
