Flyzone wrote:
> On 30 Apr, 17:11, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You don't need a regexp:;
>
> I need a regexp.....i'm parsing a file with a rule-file that contains
> also regexp and strings too....
Well then it seems like you might want to rethink this rule-file
approach since your problem is clearly not amenable to regular expressions.
That said, here's a regexp that might work::
((?!two:).)*one((?!two:).)*
That makes a negative lookahead assertion at each character in the string.
STeVe
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
