--- Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As an aside, while groupby() will indeed often be > used in conjunction > with sorted(), there is a significant class of use > cases where that's > not the case: I use groupby to produce grouped > reports from the results > of an SQL query. In such cases, I use ORDER BY to > guarantee that the > results are supplied in the correct order rather > than using sorted(). >
Although I'm not trying to preoptimize here, it seems a mistake to use sorted() and groupby() in conjunction, if you're dealing with a use case where you don't need the groups themselves to be sorted. Instead, you'd use something more straightforward (and faster, I think) like the cookbook "SQL-like Group By" example. http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/259173 It seems to me that the classic use case for itertools.groupby() is the never-ending stream of data where you're just trying to pick out consecutive related elements. For example, if you're snooping on syslog, you could use groupby() to avoid repeating duplicate messages to some other output stream. ____________________________________________________________________________________Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
