Perhaps a foot pedal? Hmmm.... My two cellphones don't like underbars very much. And the shift key -- while much easier -- still is cumbersome. If outlook didn't autocaps on me, this message would be in all lowercase. In fact, when communicating with friends from outlook, to their sms, I take the trouble to correct my outlook's autocorrect.
underbars are more of a reach and harder to read when you use a really nice font. camelBack -- damn, I just had to correct outlook's autocorrect on camelback -- so, what was I saying, oh yes -- camelBackNames are just freaking weird. Sooooo.... i.prefer.dots -- no, seriously sure it's slow, but forces you the think about names in a new way. or, perhaps going deep is sacrilege? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christophe > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 6:18 AM > To: python-list@python.org > Subject: Re: Is PEP-8 a Code or More of a Guideline? > > Joe Riopel a écrit :>> Each requires exactly the same number of key > strokes when I do the>> math. (Too lazy to explain further...)> > foo_bar> > f, o, o, shift + underscore, b, a, r = 8> fooBar> f, o, o, shift + b, a, r > = 7 > f, o, o, _, b, a, r = 7f, o, o, shift + b, a, r = 8 > Also the shift+b is much more work than 2 keypresses IMHO. On the other > hand, the underscore is done by pressing the 8 key without any other > modifier which is very easy and accessible. Yeap, french layout rules for > that naming convention :)-- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list