In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 24, 7:19 pm, Robert Uhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snip ] > > emacs has continued doing its own thing, mostly because that thing is > > better. The CUA standards (there exists an emacs package if you really > > want them) are broken and lame--I and most other don't wish to cripple > > our text editor of choice. > > "CUA standards"? I'm sorry, I don't speak Botswanan. If you mean > Windows standards like for cut, copy, and paste, Pretty much. "Common User Access". I thought this was a well-known acronym in Windowsland, but I guess not. A Google search on "CUA" finds the Wikipedia article as the second hit. [ snip ] -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
