Paul Rubin wrote: > lex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> list = [1, True, True, False, False, True] >> status = True >> for each in list: >> status = status and each >> >> but what is your best way to test for for False in a list? > > status = all(list)
Am I mistaken, or is this no identity test for False at all? Regards, Björn -- BOFH excuse #317: Internet exceeded Luser level, please wait until a luser logs off before attempting to log back on. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
