Bjoern Schliessmann wrote: > Paul Rubin wrote: >> lex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> list = [1, True, True, False, False, True] >>> status = True >>> for each in list: >>> status = status and each >>> >>> but what is your best way to test for for False in a list? >> >> status = all(list) > > Am I mistaken, or is this no identity test for False at all?
You are mistaken. all take an iterable and returns if each value of it is true. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
